STRATEGIC “NOs” MEAN A MORE TRUSTWORTHY “YES”
Everything you say yes to means you have to say no to something else, and vice versa.
It really IS ok to establish healthy boundaries, set realistic expectations, and politely decline opportunities for relationships that seem destined to fail. That is the only way to have availability and resources for good ones! This also applies to client partnerships.
Clients deserve the best service provider for their needs, even when it’s (gasp!!) not us (at least at that time). If I know right away that we are not a good fit, or that I won’t be able to deliver the service and attention they need and deserve, I have no problem with saying so and genuinely wishing them all the best in their search for the next service provider.
I will also have those straightforward discussions to try to salvage a challenging relationship before we have no choice but to break up. Sometimes I am the problem. Sometimes not. The only way to find out is to have that difficult conversation! No one likes them, but they are necessary and are healthy, if done right. They key is to not be so afraid of them that you procrastinate and create some real damage.
My reputation for being a tough and demanding taskmaster comes honestly enough, I admit – and I am not the only one!
It is becoming more common for professionals to understand and better provide more value for the clients who are a good match when they are more strategic about their partnerships. Clients are generally more satisfied, too, because then their pro really is good at what they are really good at!
Here is a great article originally posted on LinkedIn, written by another professional I greatly admire and am learning valuable information from:
https://www.smartvault.com/blog/2017/4-things-hate-rid-toxic-clients/
Someone else was waaaaay ahead of all of us, though……
QUESTION: What are some of the criteria you use to evaluate client or service provider relationships? What is something that is not a dealbreaker, but troublesome enough to cause concern or frustration and trigger a discussion?

